Corner Tree Practice

Community

Borderline Personality Disorder – a story of hope

Thanks to Eureka Street for publishing this piece on Borderline Personality Disorder. A great deal has changed about our understanding of and treatment of the condition. We now know that trauma is no longer essential to its development, and this year three separate studies demonstrated a 90% resolution rate after a 2 year period with appropriate community management. We are better at recognising early signs in adolescence, and getting help then. There is also a significant component of spirituality to its treatment, which I explore here. One way to think of a personality disorder is as a cartoonish exaggeration of a normal personality trait to the point that it affects daily life. The self-absorbed become narcissistic, unable to love anyone but themselves. The grandiose become histrionic, with garish, outlandish behaviours intended to draw others to them in a lifelong but ineffective desperation for human connection. Unlike the other personality disorders, those with borderline personality disorder (BPD) are heavily over-represented in mental health care services, with about 40 per cent of all mental health inpatients having the condition, despite only one to two per cent of the population suffering from it (BPD Foundation Consensus statement). BPD is not merely an exaggerated personality trait, but a complex mental health condition that profoundly affects an individual’s emotional regulation, relationships, and self-image. Contrary to the notion of BPD as merely a response to trauma, recent research, including studies cited by the BPD Foundation and work by scholars like Skaug (2022), points to a more nuanced understanding that includes genetic factors. The borderline are driven by a fear of abandonment. Patients with BPD often experience intense emotional pain and may exhibit behaviours that can be challenging for both themselves and the professionals seeking to help them. For instance, during my early years in psychiatry, I still vividly remember meeting with a patient in crisis who berated me so severely I was unable to tolerate talking to her any longer, and left her to be assessed by the morning doctors. The interaction lasted five minutes and happened twenty years ago. Such episodes underscore the complexity of providing care in these situations. Patients with BPD have frequent suicidality, low self-esteem and severe mood swings. My textbooks advise that this condition usually arises during adolescence. That’s a bland, academic way of describing the horrific truth — that one in 50 children from the age of twelve can one day wake up with the belief that they have to kill themselves. ‘One of those concepts, that we are loved and deserve life, is at the heart of this targeted psychotherapy — and surely at the heart of human experience itself.’ I once spoke to a father and his daughter, who presented after ten years of difficulty. Their own doctor had dissuaded them from seeing psychiatrists, believing that she would grow out of the condition, until he was finally convinced by her therapist to refer her. I asked my standard initial question: ‘Do you have a voice in your head telling you that you are a horrible person?’ Her father was shocked to hear that this voice had been present since she was eleven, and she’d never mentioned it before, out of fear. BPD has the reputation of being one of the most difficult mental disorders to treat — as well as being one of the most controversial. Most antidepressants have minimal impact on the mood features, often leading to early despondency in treatment. Early research found that 70 per cent of psychiatrists did not tell their patients that they had the condition, simply because of the stigma associated with it, and clinicians feared the potential negative impact of the diagnosis. I once worked at a service where several clinicians explained to me how important it was for patients to remain uninformed about their condition so they wouldn’t keep turning up for help. And that is one of the few saving graces of the syndrome: it pushes the sufferer to keep looking for help, in the hope that someone will be able to rescue them. There was a young woman I once met, who, after three years of repeated admissions, finally had the BPD diagnosis given to her. I was worried that she was going to take it badly, but was amazed at her relief. ‘All this time, I thought I was just a bad person. Now I know what I have.’ One breakthrough in treating BPD has been the development of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT), which I came across a few years ago. DBT has revolutionized the treatment landscape, with remission rates significantly improving, from remission rates after completed treatment of barely 30 per cent to 85 per cent. For the first time, many patients who had access to the therapy were granted a modicum of control over their inner darkness. Early critics suggested that the proponent, Dr Marsha Linehan, merely happened to be highly charismatic, but when others started replicating her methods, they continued to prove effective. One of the key components of DBT is mindfulness, something most of the public is aware of, possibly because of how simple it is to market. (Those adult colouring books you see in newsagents emerged from one of the suggested DBT exercises). Mindfulness is an acquired skill that is beneficial to the mental wellbeing of anyone, not just those with borderline personality disorder. In BPD, the mindfulness practice is directed at acknowledging and accepting one’s feelings, thoughts and sensations. It’s about learning to think in the opposite direction to the way the borderline mind wants to go. I’ve had patients liken it to learning to ride a bicycle uphill. Dialectical Behaviour Therapy is not easy. Dropout rates for initial engagements are usually higher than 60 per cent. Those who persist, succeed. It was only a few years ago that Dr Linehan admitted that she herself had borderline personality disorder. It had failed to respond to medication, or electroshock therapy, and she spent two years at an inpatient unit, largely in seclusion as its ‘worst patient’.

Borderline Personality Disorder – a story of hope Read More »

How to Get Sleep

How To Get Sleep Drink milk. Sleep is one of the commonest problems people see their doctor with. One study identified as many as a third of general practitioner attendees had concerns with chronic insomnia. It is a universal experience, but one which is as mysterious regarding its purpose as to how to treat it. It certainly is a difficulty for parents with young children, and there have been concerns regarding its overuse in Australia for children. There are two major issues with sleep. One of them, is that it is a common endpoint for almost every mental illness. Depression, mania, anxiety, even psychosis – these are all classically described as being associated with sleep difficulties. Given that the odds are that you may have sleep problems, I might point out that a sleep issue does not mean a mental illness per se, only that if it is difficult to treat there is a higher likelihood – i.e., see your doctor if symptoms persist (sorry). The second issue is the high risk of addiction with almost any prescribed – and many over the counter – hypnotic agents. I’m aware of at least three commonly prescribed agents, all of which were promoted initially with a marketing spiel describing it as the “first non-addictive sleep agent”. I’m still waiting on that promise. Which brings me to milk. I work as an old age and general adult psychiatrist – meaning I see a lot of people with long term difficulties with sleep (for my older patients, this can be decades). Back when I was a training registrar, I had the good fortune of working in a small rural acute inpatient unit, that had some of the most unwell patients around. These were huge blokes with more tattoos than teeth, and were veterans of pretty much any prescribed – and nonprescribed – substance you could name. Nothing we gave them would work at night time short of the most powerful (and dangerous) sedatives, but what I saw work with regularity, was hot milk with cinnamon. There is very little that compares to the sight of a giant biker who could snap you in half peacefully sleeping off a prescription of dairy. The literature seems to support this. A recent systematic review of 14 studies identified milk being associated with improving sleep quality. Researchers are divided as to how it works – there is tryptophan and melatonin in the average glass of milk, but it’s questionable as to how relevant the dosing is. There is anecodotal support for the temperature, with some suggesting that the warmth of the milk may increase internal body temperature, leading to a cascade of operations (https://www.livescience.com/does-warm-milk-help-sleep) that helps relax the body. In my practice, I ask my patients to plan for sleep with a night time ritual, warming up half a cup of milk in the microwave and experimenting with timing so that it’s hot but not undrinkable. Some prefer nutmeg, but I suggest a minor dash primarily for flavour. Lactose-free alternatives seem to work, but I recommend against soy milk, because I can’t stand the stuff. The cup should be drunk immediately before they go to bed, and then other sleep hygiene elements come in (quiet room, no blue lights or devices, slightly lower temperature, etc.) Invariably my newer patients blink at me, wondering why they’re paying my gap. I have about a 30% success rate with milk as a sleep aid, and I’ve had patients addicted to benzodiazepines for years who successfully weaned off them via milk. It’s probably not the most cutting edge thing I can prescribe, but if it worked for those giant bikies, there’s a good chance it’ll work for you.

How to Get Sleep Read More »

The History of Antidepressants

The History Of Anti-Depressants https://youtu.be/ClPVJ25Ka4k I had a great time collaborating with TED Education on this video. We discuss the history of the first antidepressants, from iproniazid and imipramine through to fluoxetine. We’ve come a long way very quickly, but there is still a lot more to the mystery of depression to unravel. In the meantime, the good news is that we have effective tools to treat it – even if we don’t necessarily understand why they work! For more great work, check out TED Education – https://ed.ted.com/

The History of Antidepressants Read More »

How do you tell if someone has an anxiety disorder during a pandemic?

How do you tell if someone has an anxiety disorder during a pandemic? The commonest mental illness is anxiety, afflicting up to 30% of Australians at some point in their lifetime. Roughly a sixth of them have a specific phobia, often a fear of infection. For those who have been suffering in secret distress – finally, it is their time to shine. I’ve had difficulties of late working out how to assess patients for mental health issues in a time where one can no longer shake hands. Even more confusing is those with pre-existing mental health issues who appear to (relatively) improve. I’ve had a contact confide that, for the first time in their life, they’ve felt normal – normally avoiding buttons or surfaces and with an uncontrollable need to sterilise their hands after any form of social interaction, their private shame no longer seems a problem. They’re the only one who still has stocks of disinfectant. An unusual – but attractive – argument against the treatment of mental health issues has been the theory that many mental health presentations are in fact protective in some way. Depressive conditions leading to people staying at home certainly is associated with a reduced exposure to risk, which is part of why depressive symptom constellations have been linked to hibernation behaviours. Some personality disordered individuals live life on a permanent sense of distrust of others, which is a positive boon in civil unrest environments. Only Lady Macbeth would survive a pandemic. So if that’s really the case, what should one do if one is worried about COVID-19 – a situation which certainly should invite anxiety? How does one decide if this is abnormal?  Public health issues with strong media penetration have always been associated with an increase in mental health presentations. These can be new events out of proportion to the issue, as in crisis reactions (called adjustment disorders, or acute stress disorders if lasting more than a few weeks after the stressful event is over), or worsening of prior mental illness (such as depression or anxiety disorders). Regardless of whether these are new or exacerbated mental health issues, they still require – and respond to – treatment.  In differentiating a healthy anxiety response from an abnormal (or pathological) one, a useful rule is to consider what it leads to – if it leads to helpful behaviour, such as improved vigilance, sourcing reputable information, improved hygiene, this is rarely a concern. If the anxiety leads to loss of sleep, repetitive obsessing to the point of interfering with daily functioning, thoughts of self-harm, or distress regarding one’s own anxiety itself, mental health support is appropriate. It’s tempting to falsely reassure – but this should be discouraged, as it complicates one’s responses, and leads to an escalation of worry and distrust. In times of fear, there is no need for more. If you are worried about COVID-19, you are not alone. As we know, COVID-19 sufferers are not advised to see their GPs as initial port of call. But if your anxiety is interfering with your life, this is where your doctor can help. Mental illness doesn’t disappear just because everyone is afraid – but that doesn’t make it any less deserving of treatment. Share Author: Neil R Jeyasingam Date: 04 April, 2023 Posted By: Profectus-Admin

How do you tell if someone has an anxiety disorder during a pandemic? Read More »

Why 65 is old – Blame Politics

Why 65 is old – Blame Politics (L-R) Warrant Officer Jennine Riches from Multi National Base Command – Tarin Kot with Prime Minister Tony Abbott on October 28. DoD photo by Cpl. Mark Doran, Australian Defence Force/Released. This election, it’s important to remember the impact politicians can have on society. For example, the concept of the older person. There is ongoing debate regarding what constitutes an older person, but it generally centres around a magic number. In 2012 the Australian Human Rights Commission arranged a study in to Age Discrimination. As part of the survey, they asked people what they regarded constituted an older person. People under the age of 55 generally said that it was those who were 65 and older. Those who were over 65 regarded it as related to a change in stage of life – such as social circumstances or health. But where did we get the number 65 from? Like most things, we can blame the Germans. Faced with rising liberal sentiment and the threat of losing power, Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck, the “Iron Chancellor”, introduced the world’s first national pension system. Initially set at age 70, it was later revised to 65, and the concept stuck, and the world went on to adopt a retirement age of 65. This pension, by the way, was introduced in 1889, when life expectancy was approximately 39. It hasn’t really been updated since then, and billions have lived with the knowledge that their productive life is expected to end at 65 – because a conservative said so, because he was frightened of liberals. So, this election, be mindful of the impact our politicians can have on the way we work, live, and even think. Fortunately, when it comes to destructive political movements, the Germans seem to have learned their lesson. We might need a bit more time, or hopefully not. We’ve got until the age of 65 either way. Share Author: Neil R Jeyasingam Date: 08 May, 2019 Posted By: Profectus-Admin

Why 65 is old – Blame Politics Read More »

Loving Life in Late Life

Loving Life in Late Life Loving Life in Late Life Seminar, 14 Feb 2019 Is it possible to put on a community engagement conference, provided free of charge to the public, involving major speakers from leading stakeholders in the ageing industry, in less than a month? That was the question put to the Faculty of Old Age and the Psychogeriatric Nurses Association earlier this year, culminating in the first joint venture of its kind. Held on February the 14th as part of Seniors Festival and appropriately titled, “Loving Life in Late Life”, the event welcomed 150 registrants from all backgrounds – seniors, carers, and health professionals. Following a Welcome to Country by Mr Michael West and opened by the Honorable Scott Farlow (representing the Minister for Ageing) as well as Dr Sue Packer (Senior Australian of the Year, 2019), people heard from Professor Bruce Stevens (Charles Sturt University), Ms Ainslie Lamb (University of the 3rd Age), Mary Magias (of Carers NSW) and Mr Rod Pirotta (PGNA). Capacity Australia maintained the need for self-empowerment, Dr Sid Williams reflected on how old age was neither wholly bad nor good, and Dr Jeyasingam from the Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research closed with an interdisciplinary forum. A highlight of the event was when an 87 year old member of the forum stood up, to bemoan how she was finding it difficult to gain guidance in late life, noting that recommended exercise regimes all seem to cut out at 75. She spoke about her friends, beset with media portrayals of healthy ageing, found such issues confronting and demeaning, preferring to be left alone. The interesting response from Professor Stevens was whether disengagement was truly a choice – a fundamental question for the ageing individual. There was much discussion about MyAgedCare, models of ageing, and a positive celebration of the amazing activities of the U3A. Visitors also were able to access free materials from LegalAid and Carers NSW. This did not however include Dr Williams’ book, which one attendee mistook as being a free sample and went missing for several hours. My sincerest thanks to Drs Millie Ho and Daryl McMahon of the FPOA for their assistance with this event, and the indomitable will of the rest of the PGNA Committee – Regina McDonald, Anne Hoolahan, and Marianne Cummins. Many thanks to the Faculty of Old Age for supporting this important event. Share Author: Neil R Jeyasingam Date: 19 February, 2019 Posted By: Profectus-Admin

Loving Life in Late Life Read More »

Wisdom is not automatic

Wisdom is not automatic Smirking teenagers in front of an old man. A group of smirking teenagers stand in front of an old man. The teens wear red Make America Great hats, which have expanded in their original role beyond merely describing Trump republican nomination supporters. The old man in front of them, however, is a Native American elder and Vietnam War veteran. This meeting, thanks to the Internet’s attention span, over the weekend drew global condemnation for the callous and disrespectful confrontation, the failure of misguided youth to respect the wisdom of their elders. Like everything else, this is not the entire story. It was the elder, a Nathan Phillips, who approached the teenagers – not the other way around – apparently in an effort to reduce tension between them and some nearby protestors. The teen principally seen in the video released a statement that he did not interact with the protestor. The hats, as previously described, mean many things to many people – not necessarily what the teenagers were intending, apart from perhaps rebellious provocation, and even that is suspect. Lastly, of course, there is no guarantee that wisdom has anything to do with being elderly. The good thing is, there’s an app for that. Or rather, a scale. In January this year, the Journal of Psychiatric Research published the San Diego Wisdom Scale, a system of specifically quantifying a person’s wisdom. Assessing intelligence is a well known concept, with the “IQ” test being that which people are most familiar with – and a relatively simple process at that, in assessing the ability of people to incorporate and manage new information. Wisdom, however, has been seen as a more esoteric and unusual concept. The authors of the scale took the sensible – and rather wise – approach of assessing wisdom not in terms of its components, but its effects – in leading to individuals developing particular personality traits. Incorporating neurobiology, philosophy, and even theological constructs, the researchers identified wisdom as a set of behaviours and traits that could now be measured. What then became interesting was when the scale was deployed in a group of individuals of varying age. Two major features were found – loneliness was extremely common in old age and even middle age, although this was significantly reduced when wisdom was present. The second issue was more subtle – it identified that wisdom had a negative correlation with age. Understanding what wisdom means is a problematic issue, as it brings into question fundamental questions about our society and what we value – experience, resilience, and social cohesiveness. These are thought to be related to age, but it appears it may not be an automatic issue. It is possible for a person to grow and still be in error – as, increasingly, critics are identifying Mr Phillips of. However one must not assume wisdom is assumed always to lead to accurate decisions – as Mr Phillips’ motivations for behaviour, as indeed the red-hatted teens, suggest. One of the truly encouraging issues with the scale is that it suggests that wisdom can indeed be taught, by working towards particular behaviours that lead to being a better person. The ability to give good advice, the ability to control one’s own emotions, a capacity for empathy, tolerance for divergent values, and decisiveness – these were among the features that the wisdom scale researchers identified as salient issues. Perhaps this can encourage us not to reduce our reactions to viral clips to automatic denunciations of fundamental social mores. On a more practical level, it suggests that everyone in the clip had something to learn from each other. Share Author: Neil R Jeyasingam Date: 19 February, 2019 Posted By: Profectus-Admin

Wisdom is not automatic Read More »